Re: [HEADS-UP] Moving /var/run and /var/lock to tmpfs in Rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/23/2010 12:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya!
> 
> I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn on
> /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
> with the following accepted F15 feature:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/var-run-tmpfs
> 

Is this actually an improvement?

I know that dentries and inodes for regular filesystems can be discarded
from RAM if they're not in use, is that the case for a tmpfs?
How often are the files in /var/run and /var/lock accessed? Is the
kernel likely to discard them?

Files in /var/run tend to be 4 or 5 bytes in length, does that mean they
each use an entire page of RAM or swap? There are vastly fewer swap
pages than there are filesystem blocks, isn't this less efficient?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux