Re: bugzilla bugzappers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



mÃn 2010-11-22 klockan 18:51 +0100 skrev BjÃrn Persson:
> Henrik NordstrÃm wrote:
> > * Slight adjustment of karma to provide choices "Works for me", "Problem
> > still present" and "New problems seen"
> > 
> > * "Works for me" is a +1, and also adds the refereced bug as fixed by
> > the update if not already in the list of fixed bugs.
> > 
> > * "Problem still present" is a -1 if the bug is listed as fixed.
> > Otherwise a +/-0.
> > 
> > * "Regression causing new problems" is a -1, and requires a comment
> > explaining the issue and explicit confirmation that the issue is not
> > seen in earlier version.
> 
> That should work for bugfix updates, but updates that don't fix bugs will never 
> get any positive karma. You might argue that no update should be done if there 
> are no bugs to fix, but what about bugfixes where the bugs have been reported 
> upstream but not in Red Hat's Bugzilla?

It was not meant to read that "Works for me" require a bug entry. Just
that when you get to the update via a bug you get it filled in
automatically and you have the option to reference a bug.

> I also think there should be separate choices for "still works for me" and 
> "fixes my problem". "Fixes my problem" would be what you called "works for me", 
> while "still works for me" would be for testers who had no problem before and 
> don't see any regressions.

Good idea.

Regards
Henrik

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux