Re: Fixing the glibc adobe flash incompatibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:53:21AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:16:42PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> > On 11/17/2010 12:41 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > > 2) Issues found in proprietary software cannot be fixed by anybody except
> > >    the vendor
> > 
> > False.  In this particular case, it is possible to binary edit the plugin
> > libflashplayer.so so that all its calls to memcpy become calls to memmove.
> > The change is to copy the .st_name field from the symbol for memmove to the
> > .st_name field of the symbol for memcpy, which creates another instance
> > of memmove.   With that one 32-bit change, then the player will work.
> > Memmove can be a few percent slower than memcpy, but nobody will notice.
> 
> Doesn't flash use some (in-)security scheme which involves
> checksumming its own binary?  I vaguely thought that was how the
> BBC iPlayer DRM works ...

I'm wrong here.  The half-assed scheme that they use is to take a
checksum of the SWF file:

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Protected_Streaming#SWF_verification

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/
See what it can do: http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/recipes.html
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux