|
> From: jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:16:20 -0500 > Subject: Re: Fixing the glibc adobe flash incompatibility > CC: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 08:57 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > This solution could be reverting the problem causing glibc change, or > > maybe changing it to do forward memcpy's while still using the new SSE > > instructions, or something more specific to the flash plugin, as long > > as it will automatically fix things with a yum upgrade without requiring > > any further user intervention. > > > > I would also like to point out that if this were to happen in Ubuntu > > which we sometimes look at jealously for getting more attention / users > > then us, the glibc change would likely be reverted immediately, as that > > is the right thing to do from an end user pov. > > > > I've filed a ticket for FESCo to look into this, as I believe this > > makes us look really bad, and the glibc maintainers do not seem to be > > willing to fix it without some sort of intervention: > > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/501 Isn't only 64-bit preview release affected? from adobe's website... >>We have made this preview available so that users can test existing content and new platforms for compatibility and stability. Because this is a preview version of Flash Player, we don’t expect it >>to be as stable as a final release version of Flash Player. Use caution when installing Flash Player "Square" on production machines. If they don't expect it to work properly why should we?
|
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
