On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:03 PM, <clumens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> We have been spending a lot of time and thought trying to scheme >> about how to accelerate btrfs. At this point, it is actually fairly >> stable but still missing key things (most notably a fsck that can >> fix the file system!). >> >> Last week at plumbers, we did get a large chunk of the btrfs >> developers together for a few hours and have been working to make >> sure that we have sufficient people working to get this done... > > This is good information, and makes me feel even better about removing > the need for a btrfs command line option. > > What I mean about "we're not quite there yet" is that I don't really > want to change over to it as the default in anaconda until we (1) have a > release or two with it as a non-hidden option to get some feedback, and > (2) know what our strategy with it in a greater sense is. If it's going > to allow us to do all sorts of crazy new things, I'd like to enable the > crazy new things at the same time as we switch it in as the default. > Agreed, my plan was to take away the option for F15 (I sent the anaconda patch already right?) and leave it as an optional thing for at least 2 releases until we even begin to discuss setting it as default. Another criteria I have for making it default is I want grub support, specifically grub2. So until grub2 is in Fedora and we have btrfs patches upstream in grub2 I have no intention of making it the default in Fedora. Thanks, Josef -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
