-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/09/2010 04:05 PM, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote: > On 11/09/2010 09:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 21:31 +0000, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote: >>> On 11/09/2010 07:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>>> In practice, we run very few metrics on Bugzilla >>> This is the problem we should be gather all kinds of bug metrics and >>> general component activity from bugzilla. >>> >>> This is very vital information for QA group to harvest and have. >>> ( without it we cant find the areas were both parties can do better. ) >>> >>> And since there is general will amongst reporters that this information >>> is collected this I maintainers if they are opposed that this >>> information will be harvested? >>> >>> If so why? >> no-one's opposed to it. Just no-one's actually stepping up to do it. >> We've had three attempts so far within bugzappers to get metrics going, >> and it never works out, because no-one follows through. Demanding that >> it happen is not going to magically make it happen; someone has to do >> the work. > > Do you have any links to the bugzappers discussions about this and the > code that was used in these attempts? > > Do we have access to bugzilla clone to test against? > > JBG For the latest attempt at getting some useful 'metric' data from bugzilla see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/Metrics and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:BugZappers/Metrics (Those pages are fairly specific to trying to quantify the amount/impact of the work that the triagers are doing.) Additionally, bugzilla's report.cgi is worth looking at. As an example: The number of 'Triaged' Bugs CLOSED in the last 90days with breakdown by resolution[1]. - -Jeff 1: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/report.cgi?x_axis_field=resolution&query_format=report-table&classification=Fedora&product=Fedora&bug_status=CLOSED&chfieldfrom=-90d&chfieldto=Now&chfield=bug_status&chfieldvalue=CLOSED&format=table&action=wrap&field0-0-0=keywords&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=Triaged -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM2hslAAoJEBHSWqGjRJu75jYH/3Vf58f/gAR4eQ29QvAkyRPs HrQdfIXaKzpBF+7PbXyjQ1Ab0kpZ2Rr1aK/tYg6+O7XCG+HAfFQiLs9vm8MEscJx lJ896zht2+daTzeiNp8L4OwX9JjCeuf7XQaMualK+/EruuHVq/mONyaa1MNMGl/k LoQsGIFEH19eoI0hK7p8AASN5YQhQyp7mbyPJlyXersrg7W8uzmYfk9P7KFUqACE V0CX9nLXI863phEIcTZrfqSUwNd1cGL1WyFR6WZp029ArFaYQMp3FqNXtvKQIJl1 UIrxW4EFrODCsFplVTkNjcXp9sC8YWIwKg2N+wEug8b+zVpzugCdRalmz/DWMgY= =yYVL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
