On 11/09/2010 10:33 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn > <dennisml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> No. I'm sorry but it's fundamentaly unfair to hold me responsible for the >> behaviour of others. If you think this shouldn't have been brought up fine >> but if others decide to draw premature conclusions from this it's their >> fault and not mine. > > Am I holding you responsible for others? No. I'm saying very > specifically that you started a topic about inclusion instead of > simply inquiring as to whether people in our community are already > involved. The inquiry would have been perfectly appropriate. A > suggestion we talk about inclusion when we don't have a clearly > defined technical expert to make the case for it is not. We have a > featuring process for some very good reasons. One of those reasons is > to allow the person make the propose to provide adequate amount of > information as a starting point for a constructive discussion about > technical pros and cons. > > That's like me suggesting we have a discussion about moving over to > the hurd kernel as a default when I know absolutely nothing about > kernel implementation details and watching concerns over the issue > spiral out of control. > > I am saying very specifically that noone should propose a discussion > for technology inclusion on this list unless they feel comfortable > addressing questions of a technical nature about the technology or > failing that they bring someone along at the start of the conversation > who is able to be the technical expert when the quite expected > questions about technical issues come up. The discussion spirals when > questions go unanswered by a technical expert and the void in the > discussion is instead filled up with meatheads like myself. > Point taken. Regards, Dennis -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
