On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:17:59 +0000, JÃhann wrote: > On 11/06/2010 02:11 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On 11/05/2010 10:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:58:21 +0000, JÃhann wrote: > >> > >>> On behalf of all reporters that have never received a response from a > >>> maintainer on a component they have reported against I not only ask the > >>> ABRT maintainers to block any reports against those component that a > >>> maintainer has not responded but I also request that those components > >>> get removed from bugzilla.redhat.com. > >> Weird idea. Not sure it's worth commenting on it. The problem with > >> maintainers not responding to some tickets can have multiple reasons. > >> Some components literally are flooded with new tickets. Hundreds. > >> Thousands. > > These packages should be examined and analysed individually and > > consequences be drawn upon, if neccessary even if they might be unpleasant > > Agreed... > > JBG Agreeing doesn't fix the resource problems. For special packages, it's obvious. http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/kernel 1374 bugs found For others, it isn't. http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/gftp 49 bugs found But the bugzapping EOL script treats all packages equally, afaik. It would also kill off _the single one_ major crasher ticket for a maintainer's single package just because nobody replies in bugzilla. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
