> On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has not > > managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging can > > not even be used with the top Red Hat Java product, what is there to > > say? (and on this subject, I don't think Fedora Java can be dissociated > > from Red Hat java) > > JBoss isn't in Fedora because JBoss seems to require lots of things that > are older than what we ship in Fedora. I see this is a problem with > JBoss, not Fedora. Well JBoss is not even a single product it's a bunch of products - see http://www.jboss.org/projects/matrix. And both projects have to improve and colaborate to get things working. On our(Fedora) site we have a long way to go before having maven 3 working, rpm maven autoprovides/requires and so on and so on to make it easier for contributors. Regards, Alex -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
