Re: Changes in Java packaging guidelines - RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/02/2010 03:27 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> SO> Java SIG has prepared changes in current Java packaging
> SO> guidelines. We would welcome wider discussion/comments at this
> SO> point. From our point of view guidelines seem ready for approval by
> SO> FPC.
> 
> Could we get a diff of these guidelines against the guideline changes
> that FPC recently approved?

Recently? I haven't heard of Java-specific guideline changes for past
few months. Care to enlighten me? I guess you just meant changes from
current Java guidelines and that diff I linked in my original email:

>> Changes from current guidelines here:
>> http://bit.ly/dy3YDe

(the document was copied from Guidelines:Java so diff from first version
is diff against current guidelines)

-- 
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

PGP: 71A1677C
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux