Re: Package review template

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/02/2010 01:35 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'd like to see links to packaging guidelines for each point (or at
>> least for non-obvious ones). It's helpful for the both parties to know
>> why they have to fix things.
> 
> That's a good idea. I don't know how to integrate them and at the same
> time don't make the template too noisy. I will try to work on that one
> because I think that would come handy for new reviewers.

What we did is we have references[1]. They seem to work fairly well and
they are not too noisy IMO. YMMV of course.


[1] Like this
-- 
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

PGP: 71A1677C
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux