Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken (was: Re: Heads Up - New Firefox update)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:26:43 +0100
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> They also let several completely broken updates through and then
> delayed the FIXES for those updates, exactly as I had been warning
> about all the time.

Cite(s)?
> 
> For example, my firstboot update which was required to make the Xfce
> spin work again (there was an additional problem with the LXDE spin,
> but that one was present both before and after that update, and could
> only be noticed after that update was pushed) got delayed.

If You mean: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firstboot-1.113-4.fc14

it didn't break the Xfce spin. Xfce spin is using gdm still, which
means metacity is pulled in, which means firstboot was fine. 

So, this case seems to me like a poor example for your position. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux