Re: Space for public package git repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tim Niemueller wrote:
> Recently I wanted to modify a package. Since we now use git for
> packages, the following work flow feels natural:
>
> git clone package-repo
> make changes in package repo
> commit
> push repo somewhere
> send pull request to package maintainer
>
> Is that the anticipated workflow?

That works.  Or if it wasn't a package you planned to work on often,
git send-email can email the changes in a format suitable for git am
to import.

> Should I use fedorapeople.org webspace to push the repository to (a
> newer git version there would be nice then)

Why is a new version needed?  For simply pushing and pulling changes,
the version provided in EPEL should be fine.  It manages to work well
enough on fedorahosted, which gets a decent amount of use.

Incidentally, if you'd like to see an updated git for EL-5, point
anyone you know that uses emacs-git my way.  AFAIK, the only hang up
to updating EPEL to git-1.7 is working out how to maintain the emacs
support¹.

¹ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/600411

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There is nothing government can give you that it hasn't taken from you
in the first place.
    -- Winston Churchill

Attachment: pgpHUXDR4u087.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux