On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 13:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 10/26/2010 04:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > Having said that, I don't think this seems serious enough to be a > > blocker, though obviously we'd like the minimal install to be as minimal > > as possible. Does it cause major problems for any spins? I doubt it, I > > expect most of them will have cairo for one reason or another anyway. > > Can we make this such issues a blocker starting from the next release? > A minimal install should really be minimal. Otherwise, we have failed > and it does affect EC2 deployments among other things. it's a bit of a tricky line to draw. We have a size test that makes sure builds aren't over the targeted sizes, we could add a test that a minimal install doesn't go over a given size after installation, I guess. What size would be the target? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
