On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:59:22 -0600 Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:56:27 +0100 > Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:35:54 +0200 > > Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > xz-5.0.0 is now released and soname is now bumped to 5.0.0 in > > > rawhide. The most important changes are: > > > > > > * The compression settings associated with the preset levels > > > -0 ... -9 have been changed. --extreme was changed a little too. > > > It is now less likely to make compression worse, but with some > > > files the new --extreme may compress slightly worse than the old > > > --extreme. > > > > > > * The major soname has been bumped to 5.0.0. liblzma API and ABI > > > are now stable, so the need to recompile programs linking > > > against liblzma shouldn't arise soon. > > > > This has broken the Rawhide buildroot: > > > > DEBUG backend.py:656: /usr/bin/yum > > --installroot /var/lib/mock/dist-f15-build-911517-134161/root/ > > groupinstall build DEBUG util.py:294: Executing > > command: /usr/bin/yum > > --installroot /var/lib/mock/dist-f15-build-911517-134161/root/ > > groupinstall build DEBUG util.py:260: Error: Package: > > rpm-libs-4.8.1-5.fc15.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:260: > > Requires: liblzma.so.0()(64bit) DEBUG util.py:260: Error: Package: > > elfutils-libs-0.149-2.fc15.x86_64 (build) DEBUG > > util.py:260: Requires: liblzma.so.0()(64bit) DEBUG > > util.py:260: Error: Package: rpm-4.8.1-5.fc15.x86_64 (build) DEBUG > > util.py:260: Requires: liblzma.so.0()(64bit) DEBUG > > util.py:260: Error: Package: rpm-build-4.8.1-5.fc15.x86_64 (build) > > DEBUG util.py:260: Requires: liblzma.so.0()(64bit) > > > > Given that the ABI hasn't actually changed since the previous > > build, a short term fix could be to build a mini liblzma.so.0 that > > just links to liblzma.so.5, along the same lines as the mini > > libcurl built for the last soname bump of that library (Mon Aug 11 > > 2008, curl 7.18.2-4). > > > > The current build needs untagging anyway. > > I've untagged it and mailed Jindrich. > > Updating a rpm dep is not easy. You will need to rebuild rpm static, > or make a compat package, or some other trick. ;) The mini-library hack does the trick by proving both sonames (effectively the new one and the compat one) in the same package. Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
