Re: Anaconda suggestion...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/10/2010 1:37 PM, Chris Lumens wrote:
> Yeah, that whole area is not at all ideal.  I'm aware of it:
>
>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493249
>
> Perhaps I'll spend some time around F15 figuring out what we can do.

Oh - I didn't even think of checking for existing bugs... Yeah it isn't 
*critical* but it should would be nice to know *what* it is doing as a 
first step. Instead of the "finishing install"... "Running package post 
update scripts" is even an improvement. From there if you can get an 
idea of how many packages are left that'd be fine. As it is, its really 
hard to know what's going on. Lucky for me I have a 4 drive RAID array 
and I can hear the drives going nuts so I know nothing is 'frozen'... 
but even a general idea of what it is working on helps. I can understand 
selinux post update likely takes a whole lot of time and smaller 
packages less... Anyway good to know it is known. Otherwise not a bad 
release so far it seems.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux