Thomas Spura wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:36:23 -0400 > Neal Becker wrote: > >> I have started porting to python3. So far I have a patch for >> fpconst. I have not so far been able to contact upstream. >> >> Maybe we should start a SIG for this? >> > >>From time to time, I try to enable a python3 subpackage and open a bug, > so the original maintainer accept that change to the package. > If upstream released an extra python3 package, I sometimes package that > and get it in fedora. > > I don't think we need a python3 SIG for that. Isn't the python SIG > enought? ;-) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Python > Going forward, we should expect the current fedora packagers to provide python3 versions? So bug reports (patches for python3) for fedora python packages should be directed to the respective maintainers? -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
