On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > On 10/19/2010 11:25 AM, seth vidal wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 16:22 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >>> > >>> Hmm, So when this was broken a lot of bugs were triggered? > >>> > >>> Sure seems like if a lot of bugs are being triggered then it is NOT a > >>> niche usecase. > >>> > >>> You can't have it both ways. > >> > >> Very few people do it. When they do, lots of things break. It's kind of > >> like trying to run Fedora under the NetBSD Linux emulation. Nobody does > >> it, but if they did they'd find that a surprising quantity of code > >> wouldn't work. > > > > you keep asserting this claim - and yet all the evidence in terms of > > concerned users comes to the contrary. > > > > Can you document or backup your assertion? > > This seems like a question smolt should be able to answer... > This is what is currently in the wild for /usr: mysql> select mnt_pnt,count(*) as cnt from file_systems where mnt_pnt like '/usr%' group by mnt_pnt order by cnt; +-------------------+-------+ | mnt_pnt | cnt | +-------------------+-------+ | /usr/share/dict | 1 | | /usr/src/debug | 1 | | /usr/tmp | 1 | | /usr/share/icons | 1 | | /usr/local/sbin | 1 | | /usr/sbin | 2 | | /usr/include | 2 | | /usr/src/packages | 3 | | /usr/local/bin | 5 | | /usr/X11R6 | 6 | | /usr/local/share | 9 | | /usr/bin | 11 | | /usr/share/doc | 14 | | /usr/games | 16 | | /usr/lib64 | 30 | | /usr/local/src | 33 | | /usr/lib | 41 | | /usr/local/games | 43 | | /usr/share | 163 | | /usr/src | 329 | | /usr/local | 12814 | | /usr | 37171 | +-------------------+-------+ 22 rows in set (3.25 sec) This is out of 1,702,459 submissions of profiles that included filesystem data. So about 3% of users have something mounted in /usr and about 2.2% have /usr mounted directly. -Mike -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
