Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:23:23 -0700
Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 02:28 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> 
> > Ok, so what you're saying is, that the specific case of
> > having /boot on softraid didn't work for you.  I may have missed
> > that clarification in your first email.  I do find it odd because I
> > constantly test scenarios where /boot is a small mirror and / is a
> > large stripe and it seems to work every time for me, often starting
> > from blank disks.  I'll test that scenario again soon, maybe there
> > is something I'm doing that you're not, or vice versa?
> 
> As I recall it, Jesse, Rudolf's right - there are known issues with
> having /boot on a soft RAID and that's why it's explicitly excluded
> from the release criteria. Unfortunately it's sufficiently long since
> FUDCon Toronto that I can't recall what the known issues were
> exactly, but anaconda team may.

pre-upgrade doesn't work if boot is on raid.
I don't remember other issues when you install from disk.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux