Re: k3b fedora.us reviews or new maintainer wanted!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:41:10 +0200, Mihai Maties wrote:

[k3b-i18n]

> I would go with Rex on this one. In the past few months there were a lot of 
> minor K3b releases (7 to be precise) that used the same i18n files. This 
> would be 2.5MB * 7 ... it's quite a lot.

Instead of obsoleting an out-of-date language package at a major version
jump, one could also replace the old i18n package with a dummy package,
so a later i18n upgrade release would be installed automatically.

> > I've submitted a patch for k3b to add a --disable-libmad option to the
> > configure script, which -- when integrated upstream or patched in with
> > autoconf -- could be used to build without MAD mp3 support, even if
> > libmad-devel is installed. This would get rid of the "buildconflicts:
> > libmad-devel" for "--without mp3" builds, and is primarly of interest for
> > end-users and well-defined builds.
> 
> Great. Any news on that ?

It's in the tracker as I have not posted it via e-mail.

-- 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux