Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> Striving for usability and pleasantness for the untechnical users >>> certainly is a good thing. It gets problematic when you choose to make >>> things technically inferior just to please those kind of users. >> >> We don't have to make things inferior to improve usability. To stick >> with the "advanved storage" example: IMHO the selection screen between >> basic and advanced storage is confusing and superfluous. First it >> should probably be named "local storage" and "SAN storage". Second >> anaconda can default to local storage if a local disk is present (option >> to add SAN storage needs to be there of course). If no local disk is >> present it can go straight to SAN setup. One screen and one mouse click >> less for most of the users. > > If you want to appeal to the same audience Ubuntu is going for then you > have to remove choice. The whole storage bit needs to be completely > removed or at least stripped down. "advanced storage" certainly has to > disappear completely. I don't agree. There's nothing unusual about a dumbed-down interface for novices, with an 'advanced' tab hiding more options. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
