On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 01:03:13PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:21:33 +0200 > Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Also can someone please explain the practical advantages of requiring > > the autokarma threshold to approve the ability to push a non critical > > path update to stable instead of just requiring a net karma sum of 1? > > I asked for this several times on the Update Policy ticket but did not > > get any answer: > > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351#comment:55 > > I don't know that there are practical advantages, I think it's a > implementation detail. I'd be fine to making it allow after +1 for non > critical path updates. Could you file a RFE on bodhi for that? > (please cc me?) Done: https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/488 The practical advantage is that getting updates allowed to be pushed to stable does is disjunct from automatically pushing this update to stable. E.g. even if one is allowed to push the package to stable, one might not want to do it already with only a net karma of one. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpMyATrL0yyq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
