On 10/07/2010 12:10 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > But I agree that having a strict requirement because it's felt that the > issues that are raised by allowing the requirement to be violated are very > problematic for us as a distro but then letting certain things bundle > because they're more important than other packages is morale sapping. > Fesco is voting in the trac ticket on whether to allow libvpx to be bundled > and also whether to allow bundling of any library that mozilla decides to in > the future; I think if that passes the FPC will have to look at making it > easier for other packages to do the same. > > -Toshio > Surely its the users choice. I hate the fact that a distro feels the need to align itself with one or the other - there are plenty alternatives out there (which aren't chromium) that do the job. Let's support these or stop whinging and fork firefox. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
