On 10/05/2010 12:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 19:07 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:19:04AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 09:59 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >>>> I think the fun will come from systems that don't properly report their lid >>>> status. I think this is one of the complaints from the X developers. >>> >>> *shrug* those are separate bugs we can fix once we make the actual >>> behaviour correct. >> >> Bugs where we turn off people's displays when they're trying to use them >> are things that we should address at the start of the development >> process, not the end. > > don't we already have default behaviours based on the lid switch, > anyway? So why don't we have this problem with those? IIRC, we default > to suspending the system when the lid is closed on battery power - so > are we suspending people's systems at random, if those systems have > lying lid switches? Generally those are based on a change of lid state, which may be different. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
