Re: F14 libgdl 2.31.x broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 07:08:56 -0700, Jim wrote:

> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgdl-2.31.3-1.fc14

> Anjuta is broken on F14. I don't know if any other apps in the F14 repo
> use libgdl.

$ repoquery --whatrequires 'libgdl-1.so.3'
anjuta-1:2.31.90.0-1.fc14.i686
gnome-python2-gdl-0:2.25.3-23.fc14.i686
gtranslator-0:1.9.11-3.fc14.i686
libgdl-devel-0:2.31.3-1.fc14.i686
solang-0:0.4.1-9.fc14.i686
valide-0:0.6.1-0.22.20103003svn511.fc14.i686

And "repoquery --whatrequires libgdl --alldeps" doesn't add more than
libgdl itself.

> I'm not familiar with the internal workings of libgdl,
> however I use libgdl for a couple of my own applications. I think I can
> tell whether or not the problem is my own application.
> 
> The upstream bug report I referenced before includes a response from the
> Anjuta/libgdl developer, "Anyway, gdl 2.31.x is broken and gnome-2-32
> will ship gdl 2.30.x.". I'm inclined to trust the upstream developer if
> he says his app is broken.

Well, not responding to bugzilla tickets, sometimes it's a packager's way
to signal "I don't have time for this and would appreciate if somebody
else took over".  Dunno whether that is the case for libgdl in Fedora
though, but given your interest in libgdl, it would make sense to get
involved in the Fedora package maintenance somehow.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux