On Saturday 02 October 2010, Christopher Aillon wrote: > c. help create a real project out of http://littlesvr.ca/apng/ with > tarballs instead of just patchsets, possibly renaming it to something > else, and ship that so we can build against it. How is shipping a redundant copy of essentially the same code better than just applying the patch to our libpng package? There's even an upstream for those patchsets, I really don't see why it can't just be applied to our libpng. I know that it's a nonstandard extension for PNG. In fact, I'm really angry at Mozilla for having come up with that instead of promoting the already existing MNG! But given the situation we have now, it's in the best interest of Fedora as a distribution to ship an APNG-enabled libpng. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
