Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: [...] >> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:17:23 +0200 >> Dodji Seketeli <dodji@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Brandon Lozza <brandon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> > Most of us KDE users want deliberate visible changes to the user. >>> > That's the point in having the latest version. >>> >>> Sorry if this has been already answered before, but what about having >>> the KDE SIG issuing its own respin'ed DVDs, along with its own >>> backport repo for stable versions that have been released? >> [...] > > I have done that on occasion in the past, but these have generally been > unofficial/unbranded respins, since the backported builds were done outside > of fedora infrastructure. > So maybe this point would need to be addressed then? I mean, we'd need to provide backport repositories that are perceived to be official enough for users who would want to use them. Pushing updates to these backport repositories would be subject to a specific backporting policy. If this idea has legs, I guess the SIGs who are interested enough should stand up and contribute a backporting policy proposal. > It also requires that other things don't break the creation of live images > (like livecd-tools, udev, NetworkManager and friends now on f13, for gory > details and a "fun" read, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624028 > ) Yeah, I guess this falls into the "bugs as usual" category :-) Hopefully those will be fixed eventually. -- Dodji -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
