On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:21 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > This here sounds strange: > | The update rate for any given release should drop off over time, > | approaching zero near release end-of-life; since updates are primarily > | bugfixes, fewer and fewer should be needed over time. > > This essentially says that after 12 or 18 months all software in Fedora > is bug free and does not need any updates. This is a very strange > assumption. E.g. why do we stop supporting the software after it became > totally stable? IMHO this claim cannot reasonably be made. There is a difference between "stable" and "bug free". Known limitations are preferable to moving targets. Again: if we kept updating everything to the very latest thing all the time, why even bother doing releases. Everyone would just run rawhide. Right? - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
