On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:13:25AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot distribute > > > unlike say the Intel firmwares. I could be wrong though. > > > > That's still true of the b43 firmware for older (pre-802.11n) devices, > > but the firmware to go with their new driver is now in > > linux-firmware.git. > > > > Their *original* offering of that new firmware had a stupid licence -- > > you could only distribute it if you promised to indemnify and defend > > Broadcom from all related third-party lawsuits. They fixed that though, > > and I merged it. > > Nevertheless, everyone I know that has reviewed the newly released > driver code is being treated for eye cancer. I wouldn't expect to > see it in F-14. My glib statement above seems to have caused a little heartburn for our friends at Broadcom. To be fair, I do not believe that the Broadcom-provided driver is substantially any worse than any of the many other vendor-provided drivers we have seen over the years. In fact, it seems to have drawn a lot of immediate interest and has already seen a number of community-provided patches posted. That said, it is still extremely late for F-14 consideration. Those interested in seeing this driver in some later F-14 kernel update or in F-15 or beyond are strongly encouraged to take-up this driver's cause in getting it migrated from drivers/staging to drivers/net/wireless in the upstream kernel. Thanks, John -- John W. Linville The truth will set you free, but first it will linville@xxxxxxxxxx make you miserable. -- James A. Garfield -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
