On 09/16/2010 04:48 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:04 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: >> Nils Philippsen said the following on 09/15/2010 03:28 AM Pacific Time: >>> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 17:13 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: >>>> Shouldn't ABRT be looking to a file like /etc/fedora-release to >>>> determine the release version? >>> >>> root@rawhide:~> cat /etc/fedora-release >>> Fedora release 15 (Finian) >>> >>> What you say ;-)? >>> >>> Nils >> >> I guess I'd say, there's a bug in /etc/fedora-release :-) > > Can we get a word from Jesse on this? For context, Jesse, this is my > point that things like ABRT are looking for "15" as the version of > Fedora to file bugs against, based on the release info. But 15 is > rawhide until it branches. So some kind of change is required. Either > the release package is changed, things like ABRT are, or we decide stuff > present pre-branch counts enough toward the final and make the BZ "15". > > Jon. > > If I remember it correctly there use to be a word "Rawhide" in /etc/fedora-release which ABRT use to determine is it's rawhide. So now, when it's obviously gone, what is the right way to determine if the release is rawhide? Thank you, Jirka -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel