On 09/15/2010 04:29 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > It is still necessary to take into account users who think that > Gnome-Shell is something like KDE4 :) In what specific way? They can just continue using GNOME Panel. >> GNOME Shell is also different from systemd >> in the sense that it affects every single user of Fedora and deserves a >> closer scrutiny. > Ouh, but Gnome shell would affect 50% of Fedora users. We don't really have any reliable stats for DE usage. >> FWIW, I think GNOME Shell deserves extensive testing >> before made as default as well. FESCo's handling of systemd feature as a >> process has gaps that needs to be fixed as well. Nevertheless, I would >> like to thank Lennart for his extensive work on getting systemd where it >> is now in such a short period and Matthew Miller for playing the role of >> a very constructive critic and following up on bugs methodologically. > I agree that SystemD should be in reasonable stable state for making > it default init. Also very constructive criticism has helped this > project. > > But I feel that: > - may be too early to cut it as default init from the release - I see > no problem if would have been given another month to Lennart for > fixing latest "critical" documentation issues > - problems that you point out in the email to test@ IMHO do not have > any major significance You are confusing me. There aren't any "critical" documentation issues. My list is a specific one. What you have is a subjective feeling. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
