On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andrea Musuruane wrote: >> Why xulrunner has been built against this and pushed to stable? > > Because Firefox/Thunderbird maintainers have the ability to > Push-To-Stable regardless of what the Fedora package policies say. Harrumph. > > I have previously complained of this fact before when these packages > broke things but my complaints fell on deaf ears. What is the correct > course of action to stop this nonsense? File a ticket with FESCo. We should have "*all* packages go trough updates-testing, regardless of who's the maintainer or what's the reason of an update". If FESCo finds out that this is a bug (some packages can be pushed to stable directly) in Bodhi, fix it, ASAP. <rant> My security fix build was rejected going to stable directly, because it could break anything (freeciv game), so i expect critical packages for end users have to go trough as well. </rant> -- Best regards Thomas -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
