On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 17:13 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 03:14:12PM +0000, Branched Report wrote: > > 1:libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14.i686 requires febootstrap >= 0:2.8 > > 1:libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires febootstrap >= 0:2.8 > > Yup, this is a cock-up. > > I pushed libguestfs and febootstrap on the same day to testing > (libguestfs in the morning, febootstrap in the afternoon). But > febootstrap didn't go into testing for another 3 days. > > As a result, 7 days later, I pushed libguestfs thinking I could push > the dependent febootstrap, but now in fact I have to wait another ~3 > days to do that. Since the "acceptance policy" overrides packager > discretion, I just have to wait it out (or go through some other > process palaver, it's easier just to wait). > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/febootstrap-2.9-1.fc14 When you are doing an update which involves changes to multiple related packages, you should always push them as a single update transaction. It avoids exactly this sort of problem, and others besides. Pushing multiple related changes as separate updates is just asking for problems. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
