On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 01:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gummi-0.4.8-2.fc13 update has > been pushed to stable despite known brokenness (it doesn't start at > all). See last comment > > Upstream bug report by the Fedora package maintainer at > > http://dev.midnightcoding.org/redmine/issues/97 > > Red Hat bugzilla report at > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629707 > > Why has this happened and how can we avoid it in the future? > > Conversation comes from http://identi.ca/conversation/48201120 It looks like no-one tested it. If the bug is in fact as described, one obvious way to improve this would be for the maintainer to at least launch it before submitting it as an update :) (as the bug reporter notes, our maintainer reported this bug upstream so he appears to be aware of it, yet he pushed the update anyway, which just seems bizarre). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
