Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 15:35 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>
>> Indeed, imo we should add them to the release criteria.
>
> It's a rather indigestible lump, for the criteria. James and I were
> thinking about a 'module' system for the release criteria so it can link
> out to other pages, but I'm wondering when a dilution effect would start
> kicking in. I'm not sure everything on that list is genuinely something
> we'd hold up a release for, either. But it's certainly something I want
> to use for the systemd test day.

Well I am not saying "go add the whole list" ... but at least a subset of it.
Having a working initsystem should be release goal imo (where working
is more than just "it boots").
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux