On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 13:12 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > And, yes, the harm won't be equally distributed— it seems to me that > Fedora has ignored quite a bit of harm because it didn't primarily > fall on what the developer's considered a "typical desktop" (which, > as far as I can tell, really means a particularly narrow set of laptop > hardware with a particularly narrow set of users and use cases). Why > Fedora keeps chasing a market which Ubuntu has undeniably won is > beyond me— but nevertheless it's not acceptable to pretend that harms > don't exist simply because they don't hit the one use case you care > about most, not unless Fedora is willing to say that people running > servers, developers, and other power users ought to use some other > distribution and that Fedora doesn't care if it loses all of these > users. > Well - to be fair - fedora is going to take a big ding in terms of users whenever rhel6 (and centos6, I assume) is released. It'll be relatively new and stable-focused. Just like we did with rhel5.. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
