On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:06 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > This, however, is just packaging guidelines. From readng the thread, there > are many things that I think people would like covered with systemd before > they would feel comfortable with it. So, I'm going to attempt to quantify > what would need to be tested and verified. This document focuses on > backwards compatibility. THIS IS GOING TO BE VERY VERBOSE. Comments, changes, > etc. welcome. This looks great, and I'd definitely like to use it as the basis for the systemd test day. Once comments and so on are in, could you post a 'version 2.0'? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
