El sÃb, 13 de 03 de 2004 a las 16:18, Xose Vazquez Perez escribiÃ: > Peter Backlund wrote: > > > This has to be one the most ridiculous version numbers ever...thirteen > > release candidates between 3.0.0 and 3.0.1? Somebody has misunderstood > > the concept of version numbering, or this is extremely mission critical > > software :-) > > Numbers are always stupid Numbers are not stupid at all, when you're trying to build a software distribution ;) > , what is _really_ important are the _bugs fixed_ Yes you're right but, how do you know the new releases don't carry other bugs if you don't test them hardly ? and, How can you test an application hardly if you're updating each time a release goes up ? Developers usually get track and fix bugs in their packages, but most can't get the time to test it in each software distro. One bug fixed in one package can cause lots of problems on a package group, even while the bug gets fixed. Unfortunately, things are not as easy as to get the last version of each application, package it and throw out the bundle.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
