Hi, 2010/8/20 Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 20/08/10 03:31, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable? >> >> My question is because there were also some> 2.6.30 builds for >> F11 which never rolled out and it could possible relax some things >> in combination with VMware / open-vm-tools >> >> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1373 >> >> I see this two builds in my test-vm form "updates-testing" >> kernel-2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.x86_64 >> kernel-2.6.34.2-34.fc13.x86_64 >> >> > There are some regressions in 2.6.34.2-.... I would prefer, that they're > getting solved before it is shipped. 2.6.34.4 solved some memory corruption problems after resume. 2.6.34.5 was released a few minutes ago, but the problem is that it is probably the last supported 2.6.34 kernel. I'm using 2.6.35.2-8.fc13.x86_64 on my home system. It works fine. > One regression is e.g. a hard lockup during suspend. > c.f. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-2.6.34.3-37.fc13 > > I've seen additional random lockups during daily use, as another tester > reported. > > Matthias > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Regards, M -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
