On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose a general rule that ABRT crash logs should remain > "assigned" to the actual application, unless an actual investigation > has been done and there's a "reasonable" certainty the flaw is in the > library code in which it happened to crash. > > Rationale: Applications are more likely to be buggy (I'm just > asserting this, but it seems obvious), and just because a crash > happened inside the library, particularly when C/C++ is involved, > means nothing; the flaw could still be in the application. If we > reassign them, it's harder to make all crashes for an application > visible. > > I'm fine with being added to a CC list, but reassigning is more of a mess. > > Sample crash: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624098 Hah I proposed the opposite here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603289 ... in my case I get lots of compiz bugs that a clearly mesa / driver bugs and all I can do do is to reassign them. I got tired of doing that so I filed said bug. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
