Re: assigning of abrt crashes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:01:36 -0400
> Colin Walters wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to propose a general rule that ABRT crash logs should remain
>> "assigned" to the actual application, unless an actual investigation
>> has been done and there's a "reasonable" certainty the flaw is in the
>> library code in which it happened to crash.
>
> Who should do that investigation, when the maintainer of the actual
> application is unable to do so? A bug tracker with
> FE-NEEDSHELPWITHBACKTRACE would help here. Maybe FES [1] would like to
> help here in that case.

Try the upstream author first?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux