Re: New bodhi release in production

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:54:30PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > Bodhi also allows you to edit the stable karma value and unless it is
> > implemented differently (or has changed again), you can just use a
> > stable karma value of 1 and ask someone except the update submitter to
> > provide the +1 karma and the update can be pushed to stable. This is
> > imho reasonable even after only a one line change to a build.
> 
> You still need to get somebody to +1 the update, 

Yes, this is what I wrote. And I think it is reasonable. Especially with
the whole Plasma SIG, which are probably more than two people, you
should have no problem finding them.

>and more if people -1ed it 
> in the past due to regressions which are already fixed in the current edited 
> version. (Yes, update groups will be edited instead of obsoleted if we 

The same people that provided the -1 karma can provide a +1 karma. And
you only need have of these people to change their karma vote to get
back to zero karma. This should also not be a major problem, unless
there are people providing unjustified -1 karma to cause problems. But
you did not mention this.

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgp5wtBiHLOpJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux