Re: New bodhi release in production

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/12/2010 07:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> Now without any further testing the package can be pushed to stable,
>> which contradicts the purpose of this whole change in bodhi.
>
> Sssh, why can't you keep quiet about this?!
>
>> I think, for packages that are modified during the testing period,
>> this N should be calculated from the day the last push was made to
>> testing.
>
> NO! I really don't want any small fix to my update to restart the whole
> testing cycle from scratch! Imagine I want to edit something in the update
> notes, e.g. add a Bugzilla reference, I have to edit the update for that,
> but does this warrant new testing? No!

Ok, so the problem here is that bodhi unpushes updates when you edit 
*anything* in it.  If it only unpushed an updated when you add/remove 
builds from it, then this scenario would be sane.

I'm going to tackle this issue next, to ensure that you can add 
bugs/notes to a testing update without having it reset the time-in-testing.

luke
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux