Re: Fedora's ssh known hosts file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 01:55 -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote: 
> On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 09:07 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: 
> > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:04, Matt McCutchen <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 22:23 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > >> Yes ssh is secure if used properly. To get the proper known_hosts entry,
> > >> one has to download https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ssh_known_hosts btw.
> > >
> > > I'm very glad to see that Fedora provides such a list.  I just installed
> > > it on my computer (after filtering out hostnames not ending with
> > > fedoraproject.org, for obvious reasons).
> > >
> > > Is it documented anywhere?  For full security, every packager should
> > > install it rather than allowing ssh to add host keys on first use.
> > 
> > Well I am not sure that file would be all that useful as it contains
> > lots of hosts a packager would not get to AND could conflict with
> > other networks as it contains a lot of 10.X.X. and 192.X.X. ips.
> 
> Then let's post an excerpt that would be useful to packagers.
> 
> > It also gets updated from time to time as we rebuild hosts.
> 
> That just speaks to the need for better tooling to maintain personal
> known-hosts files, or for Fedora to operate an ssh certificate
> authority.
> 
> It appears that the ssh folks rejected X.509 out of disgust for the
> public CAs, found themselves left with no solution at all to
> authenticate hosts the first time, and are now reimplementing it
> incompatibly.  The man page claims the ssh implementation is "much
> simpler" -- perhaps, but it won't integrate with X.509-based systems and
> will be playing catch-up on features for a while.  CRLs or OCSP, anyone?
> 
> A thread from 2002 with some frank discussion that is still valid now:
> 
> http://marc.info/?t=101179752100001&r=1&w=2

The PKI is unfortunately hopelessly broken deep in its concepts.

See for example here:
http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/interview/0,289202,sid14_gci1360143,00.html

The DNSSSEC is much more reasonable way to go.

But we are getting off-topic here.
-- 
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
                                              Turkish proverb

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux