On 08/10/2010 05:42 PM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:03:32 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > > >> No, I think more like someone who could have given him 10, gave him 5, >> with a promise of another 5, if he paid 10. >> > > That someone is under no obligation whatsoever to give him anything. > > Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that we should be immensely grateful > for every morsel of code thrown our way, but one cannot argue that the OSE edition > of syslog-ng is a useless piece of crippleware that does nothing useful compared > to the PE version (except bugging people to buy the PE edition). > > It's a useful piece of code in it's own right. syslog-ng is useful, I do not object to that. I even tried to use it 2 years ago. But it's also easy replaceable with rsyslog which includes everything and a kitchen sink as an extra bonus. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
