On 08/08/10 03:25, Matt McCutchen wrote: <snip> >> >> Would it be any benefit to the maintainers\bugzappers. >> If abrt opened the existing link, before it would report? > > And then what? Encourage the user not to add a comment unless they have > new information? If that is the proposal, I am in favor. > Yes that was the hope. But the main idea, was to get them to read the existing info. > Adding the user to CC is still correct. Agreed on that Other users are responsible for > disabling the "email me when someone else is added/removed to CC" > preference if they so desire. > >> So there wouldn't need be be so many replies of >> please try xyz?, to help cut down on noise. > > I don't understand this part. The noise I've seen consists of > abrt-added "me-too" comments with steps to reproduce. I have never seen > someone repost the same workaround in response to such a comment. > By that I mean the maintainer\Co-Maintainer\Good Citizen retelling the same fix\workaround posted earlier in the bug. To either enable\updates-testing or do xyz. Because the bug report hasn't been read by the "added to" person. -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded Friend of Fedora -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
