Re: Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bug Review Meeting 2010-08-06 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:13:00 -0400
James Laska <jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:57 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > On 08/06/2010 10:16 AM, James Laska wrote:
> > > 620211 :: NEW :: python-psyco :: konrad@xxxxxxxxxx ::
> > > python-psyco needs porting to python 2.7 in F14 and devel ::
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620211
> > 
> > Does anything actually depend on this?
> 
> It's part of the Alpha release criteria [1] that no deps or conflicts
> are present on physical media (DVD/CD).  This seems to have slipped
> through through first scrubbing of the list yesterday.
> 
>         No file conflicts or unresolved package dependencies during a
>         media-based (CD/DVD) install 
> 
> If nothing pulls this into an install transaction on DVD/CD, and it
> isn't listed in comps.xml, should it be removed from the media?  
> 
> Also, the package is only included in the i386 DVD, not the x86_64
> DVD ... not sure why.

It's 32bit only. :) The package uses asm that is not available for
x86_64. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux