Re: Integrity protection of fetches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:34:19AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 04:32:36PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > > We also use SSHFP records for those of you that want to enable
> > > > VerifyHostKeyDNS yes in their ~/.ssh/config files.  Not all of our hosts
> > > > have it but many of our 'user' based external hosts do (pkgs,
> > > > fedorapeople, fedorahosted, etc)
> > >
> > > Afaik the SSHFP records are not protected against tampering by an MITM
> > > attacker.
<snip>
> 
> Side note on this: Combined with DNSSEC, this actually would protect
> against a MITM attacker.

Not only that, but they *are* signed, and the signing key is in the ISC
DLV registry. You just need a name server that has DNSSEC enabled and
uses the ISC DLV registry (output trimmed for relevance):

$ dig +adflag -t sshfp pkgs.fedoraproject.org
;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 3

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;pkgs.fedoraproject.org.        IN  SSHFP

;; ANSWER SECTION:
pkgs.fedoraproject.org. 3600    IN  SSHFP   1 1 2AB094461D34656B4704B4EDBCF002A09EBCE4F7

Note the ad flag, which indicates that the answer is authentic.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux