Re: root-doc subpackage slightly obese

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:45:08AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > I don't think we could just say don't package documentation that's
> > ridiculously large but perhaps we could make some sort of guideline about
> > not duplicating formats on extra large docs.  Is the case with root-docs
> > (and/or kdelibs-apidocs) that we have docs in text + html + tex + pdf
> > + your_format_here?
> 
> kdelibs-apidocs is only in one format (HTML). However, we may want to add a 
> second format (QCH, which is basically an archive of HTML files) soon 
> because that way we could get Qt Assistant, and with minimal code changes 
> also KDevelop, to display that documentation. (It would be a separate 
> subpackage.) Though shipping only the QCH might also be worth considering.
> 
Depending on the technologies and applications involved I could see
duplication being okay when one format is meant for people utilizing
less /usr/share/doc/foo/*  vs running /usr/bin/documentationviewer or
/usr/bin/programmer-ide

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpndjEs8QaVb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux