On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:45:08AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > I don't think we could just say don't package documentation that's > > ridiculously large but perhaps we could make some sort of guideline about > > not duplicating formats on extra large docs. Is the case with root-docs > > (and/or kdelibs-apidocs) that we have docs in text + html + tex + pdf > > + your_format_here? > > kdelibs-apidocs is only in one format (HTML). However, we may want to add a > second format (QCH, which is basically an archive of HTML files) soon > because that way we could get Qt Assistant, and with minimal code changes > also KDevelop, to display that documentation. (It would be a separate > subpackage.) Though shipping only the QCH might also be worth considering. > Depending on the technologies and applications involved I could see duplication being okay when one format is meant for people utilizing less /usr/share/doc/foo/* vs running /usr/bin/documentationviewer or /usr/bin/programmer-ide -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpndjEs8QaVb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
