Re: The move to git!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 11:29 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Matt McCutchen <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > don't want malware landing on my machine because someone did a MITM
> > attack on a Fedora maintainer's unencrypted "git fetch" and inserted
> > some extra patches to get pushed back to the real repository later.
> 
> The git protocol makes it extremely hard to inject malware
> successfully. It would have to match sha1, _and_ match resulting
> filesize _and_ be meaningful code, all without the benefits of
> preimaging.
> 
> Even for crypto hashes that have been "broken" for a while, doing the
> above is a huge challenge.
> 
> If you do consider this a real risk, here's someone who wants to want
> to play with you, and build a bunker, 5 miles underground...
> http://marc.info/?l=git&m=111375923219555&w=2

I have to say I was tickled by Linus' imagination of how five year olds
behave:

"That's not engineering. That's five-year-olds discussing building their
imaginary forts ("I want gun-turrets and a mechanical horse one mile
high, and my command center is 5 miles under-ground and totally encased
in 5 meters of lead")."

Clearly Linus stood out even in his youth =)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux